May 09, 2013

Mind the Masses: A Hobart and William Smith Student Collaboration

Masses
Very proud of the students in my seminar on crowd theory. They've compiled their research papers into a book. The chapters span from critical discussions of early crowd theory, investigations into contemporary networked crowds, crowds and urban space, crowd theory and affect theory, and the continuing importance of concepts from crowd theory. 
May 9, 2013 2:13:49 PM | Academe, Books, Crowds

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Is Capitalism Dying? - Forbes Big corporations now wield unprecedented political and economic power. A few have ridden the shift toward online commerce to superpower status. Many more have profited by replacing expensive US labor with cheaper overseas workers and software. The end result is that the inequality of wealth and income has grown dramatically not just among households but also across the divide separating large corporations from small businesses. Studies have shown that inequality saps growth. Combine an unequal playing field with political control over the institutions meant to level it and you get a stagnant, sclerotic economy that wastes potential and allows select politically connected participants to extract unjustified rents. And the thing is, we got here almost unnoticeably, by the natural accretion of small competitive advantages over time. So now we have the most powerful and cohesive organizations on Earth devoted to the pursuit of profit above all else and frequently at the expense of public interest. And their unprecedented wealth threatens to neuter democratic checks on their behavior. In theory, corporations are still responsible to their shareholders. In practice, they’re beholden to no one but boards of directors handpicked by senior managers. Free markets respond to supply and demand, and in the US the ready alternatives to domestic labor have placed it in an especially poor bargaining position relative to capital. It’s possible the trend will slow as outsourcing wanes. In 14th century Europe, the bubonic plague temporarily boosted wages and reduced agricultural rents. Barring a similar game-changer, it’s hard to...
PREVIOUS POST
Jaron Lanier: The Internet destroyed the middle class - Salon.com You talk early in “Who Owns the Future?” about Kodak — about thousand of jobs being destroyed, and Instagram picking up the slack — but with almost no jobs produced. So give us a sense of how that happens and what the result is. It seems like the seed of your book in a way. Right. Well, I think what’s been happening is a shift from the formal to the informal economy for most people. So that’s to say if you use Instagram to show pictures to your friends and relatives, or whatever service it is, there are a couple of things that are still the same as they were in the times of Kodak. One is that the number of people who are contributing to the system to make it viable is probably the same. Instagram wouldn’t work if there weren’t many millions of people using it. And furthermore, many people kind of have to use social networks for them to be functional besides being valuable. People have to, there’s a constant tending that’s done on a volunteer basis so that people can find each other and whatnot. So there’s still a lot of human effort, but the difference is that whereas before when people made contributions to the system that they used, they received formal benefits, which means not only salary but pensions and certain kinds of social safety nets. Now, instead, they receive benefits on an informal basis. And what an informal economy is like is the...

Jodi Dean

Jodi Dean is a political theorist.

DSE
The Typepad Team

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments