Zizek's reply
Posted in the comments below, anonymously, was a comment that claimed to copy for us Zizek's response to the matter of whether or not to boycott Israel (recall, he's appearing there in connection with a film which goes against a current boycott of Israel). I say claim not because I don't believe or trust the comment, but because I have not verified it myself. I do appreciate the fact that someone posted it here, since it had been a matter of discussion. I'll add that I'm interesting in the timing of this and would wonder whether matters change given the current unconscionable atacks on Lebanon. That is a separate issue, to be sure, yet for me at least it's inseparable from the matter of Israeli aggression and its relation to the Palestinian.
Dear PACBI,
I read your letter asking me to boycott the Jerusalem Film Festival. As you know, I'm coming to Palestine and Israel for the sole purpose of supporting Udi Aloni's film, Forgiveness, which is in my opinion maybe the most beautiful, powerful and important film ever made about the tragedies of the region. Even though I know that many of the individuals who run the Jerusalem Film Festival care tremendously about creating peace and justice, I respect non-violent means of resistance chosen by my colleagues in Palestine in the fight against the Occupation, the Wall, the Israeli government's Apartheid policies, and the violence against the Palestinian people.
After communicating with others in the international community of intellectuals (including my long time friend, Judith Butler, who shared her huge appreciation with me for the movie Forgiveness and who also agrees that in this terrible time, we cannot act as if there is "business as usual"), I've decided to come as a guest of the film and not of the festival, regardless of the festival's good intentions. Therefore, I'm going to reimburse the festival for all funds that they've spent in bringing me. Yet I will speak about Forgiveness in Jerusalem, and I'm happy that the film is showing in the Jerusalem Film Festival.
Again, this isn't an easy decision for me. But I think it is the solution best fit for preserving the right of Israelis to change the hearts and minds of other Israelis through art and other means, while at the same time respecting the means of struggle that you have chosen. Further, I will make my first appearance in Ramallah for our friends who cannot come to Jerusalem because of the Apartheid policies of the Israeli government and the Wall.
Let's hope that with the combined forces of Palestinians, Israelis, and Internationals, we'll be able to bring justice, equality, and peace to the two peoples.
In solidarity,
Slavoj Zizek
This is indeed the position which Zizek took at Birkbeck, audio recordings of which are now available here:
http://rabelais.socialtools.net/
[Final session, somewhere near the middle]
Posted by: daniel | July 28, 2006 at 08:33 AM
Zizek's response, genuine or not, has not yet been posted at PACBI's website (where their open letter appealing to Zizek to boycott the film festival first appeared, here:http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article4853.shtml).
I've seen Forgiveness, the film Zizek is attending, and his sentiments, broadly speaking, are right - though there have been many other equally "powerful and important" films made about the tragedies in the region. I should also point out that the Zizek scripted, presented and narrated film The Pervert's Guide To Cinema is also being premiered at the film festival.
But Daniel is right: the letter, its irritating pseudo-sensitivity aside, does coincide with what Zizek stated in the last - 9th - of the recent Birkbeck lectures (listen to the audio here - final third: http://rabelais.socialtools.net/09.zizek.lacan.london.21-June-2006.wav), though he does displace his dilemma onto suggestions about organising (by whom exactly is left unspecified) a mass march/protest (200,000+ people) in Israel for the unification of Jerusalem ...
Nevertheless, I think Zizek has seemingly made a serious mistake here. (Would he, like Paul Simon, have visited South Africa in the 1980s during the Apartheid Regime while sanctions were operative, and the regime was bending over backwards to facilitate visits by white Westerners?)
(BTW, Jodi, Anti-semitism is much greater in America than in Europe, but its incidence anywhere is hardly a pretext, when, as Zizek well knows, the issue is anti-Zionism and not what the pro-Zionist media claim).
Posted by: Padraig | July 28, 2006 at 08:48 PM
Update: Below is an extract from a video recording of Zizek's 1-hour address at the Jerusalem Film Festival two weeks ago, following the screening of Forgiveness:
http://www.markandaubrey.com/2006/07/last-weekend-jerusalem-film-festival.html
======================
From The Jerusalem Post 11-7-06
Israeli movie picked for Tokyo Film Fest:
After screening at the Berlin International Film Festival earlier this year, Israeli director Udi Aloni's latest film, Forgiveness, has been chosen to participate in the Tokyo International Film Festival, one of the most prestigious in the world.
Forgiveness is the story of an Israeli-American who decides to return to Israel and is committed to a mental institution that stands on the allegedly haunted grounds of Deir Yassin, an Arab village attacked by a Jewish militia in April 1948. Although the movie won't be released commercially until September 21, it will be screened at the Menachem Begin Heritage Center on Thursday as part of the Jerusalem International Film Festival. On Friday, philosopher Slavoj Zizek will give a lecture on the film in Jerusalem. The film will also be screened at the Tel Aviv Cinematheque on Sunday, with a lecture by Zizek to follow.- Aliza Appelbaum
Forgiveness:
http://www.jff.org.il/show_movie.php?id=192
Pervert's Guide:
http://www.jff.org.il/show_movie.php?id=26
Posted by: Padraig | July 29, 2006 at 11:19 AM
Why be naive and imagine Zizek cares?... Given that he welcomed NATO's bombing in Kosovo, despite thousands of civilian and refugee casualties, despite the use of cluster bombs, despite Yougoslavia's infrastructure being destroyed etc., what matters to suffering people is far less significant to Zizek.
Posted by: Maria | August 03, 2006 at 07:32 AM